MCP Abilities Guard – Allow, reject, or hold for approval — or undo — any MCP action

Plugin Banner

MCP Abilities Guard – Allow, reject, or hold for approval — or undo — any MCP action

by KevinPlugins

Download
Description

MCP plugins let an AI agent act on your site. Whichever one you use, the result is the same: a model connected in Claude, Cursor or Codex can create posts, edit content, change settings and delete things, and by default nothing stands between the model deciding and WordPress doing.

Kevin MCP Abilities Guard puts a decision point in front of every ability. For each one you choose:

  • Always allow — it runs, and what it did is recorded
  • Require approval — it is held. Nothing changes until a human says yes
  • Always reject — it never runs, and the agent is told to stop trying

By default an ability runs unless it does something an undo cannot fix. Reads and ordinary writes — fetching, creating, editing — go through without asking. What is always held for a person is the rest: removing data, or reaching outside the site to send mail, make an HTTP request, or write a file. Those cannot be taken back, so they wait.

The gate is opt-in for everything else. When you want a particular ability to require approval — or to be blocked outright — you set a rule on it. And a removal that hides inside an ability whose code cannot be read is still caught: once it is seen deleting, it is held from then on.

You do not need the ability’s author to have built any of this. The guard attaches as abilities are registered, so it covers plugins that have never heard of it.

It works with whichever MCP plugin you use

There are many MCP server plugins now, each with its own endpoint, its own authentication and its own way of exposing tools. This plugin is not tied to any of them.

Abilities are guarded at the moment WordPress registers them, so a rule applies no matter which server later exposes that ability. And because MCP is a standard protocol, tool calls are recognised by their shape rather than by any plugin’s URL — so a call is inspected the same way whether it arrives through one MCP plugin, another, or one released next year.

That matters more than it sounds. Several MCP plugins register abilities and run their own server that calls the underlying code directly. Guard only the ability, and a rule you set looks armed while the agent’s actual route sails past it. This plugin watches both, so the rule holds whichever way the call comes in.

How it decides what an ability does

Most tools guess from an ability’s name, or trust whatever its author declared. Both are wrong often enough to matter — an ability called get_report can still send email. This plugin prefers evidence, strongest first:

  1. Watching it run. While an ability executes, the plugin records what it touches: posts, pages, options, users, terms, comments, and writes to any plugin’s own tables. Seen reading and never writing, it earns read-only status.
  2. Reading its code. Before an ability has ever run, its callback is inspected for database writes, outbound requests and file changes. This catches a write on the first call rather than the second.
  3. Its declared annotation. A read-only claim is taken only as a hint. A claim of being destructive, though, is believed and the ability is held — that admission costs its author access, which is why it is worth trusting.
  4. Its name. The weakest signal, used last, and never enough on its own to auto-allow.

Every row in the admin list shows which of these produced its classification, so you always know whether you are reading a verified result or an assumption. When nothing can be determined the plugin says unknown rather than guessing, and unknown is held rather than allowed.

Some things are never auto-allowed

Sending mail, making outbound HTTP requests and writing files leave no trace in your database, cannot be observed after the fact, and cannot be undone by anything. A clean run history is not evidence that they are safe. Abilities that do these are held for approval no matter how many times they have run without incident.

What a held request looks like

Nothing has changed yet. The call is queued, and the agent receives a clear message: approval is pending, do not retry, and do not attempt the same change another way. It can check the outcome later through an ability provided for that purpose, so it waits rather than looking for a way around.

You review it in wp-admin, with the arguments the agent proposed. Values that look sensitive are redacted. Approve and it runs; reject and it never does.

Seeing the change before you allow it

A held request is not a name and a shrug. Where the target can be resolved, the review screen shows the object’s current values against what the agent proposes — a real before and after, read from your database at the moment you are looking at it.

Where that is not possible the screen says so rather than dressing up a guess. A reviewer who believes they are reading a verified diff when they are reading the arguments is worse off than one who knows which they have.

Undoing what already happened

This plugin records that a call happened, who made it, how it was decided and what it touched. Putting a change back is a different problem: it needs every affected object’s previous state kept, which is storage a site that only wants the gate has no reason to pay for. That, with the full before-and-after history, is Kevin MCP Abilities Guard Pro.

Nothing here degrades without it. The gate, the approvals, the previews and the record of decisions are complete on their own.

What this plugin does

  • Sets every registered ability to always allow, require approval, or always reject
  • Covers abilities from any plugin, without their authors doing anything
  • Classifies read versus write by observation and code inspection, not naming
  • Holds mail, outbound requests and file writes for approval, always
  • Queues held calls for human review, with the proposed arguments shown and sensitive values redacted
  • Keeps every held request with who asked, who answered and when — the history an approver looks back at
  • Supports different rules per caller, so one agent can be trusted where another is not
  • Applies a held request on a single approval from any administrator (choosing specific approvers, and requiring several — any or all — is available in the Pro add-on)
  • Expires unanswered requests after a period you choose
  • Learning mode: watch and classify without holding anything, so you can see the list before you set rules
  • Reports coverage: which MCP tool calls it saw, and which did not map to a registered ability

What this plugin does not do

  • It does not run an MCP server, transport or authentication. Those are your MCP plugin’s job.
  • It does not register abilities of its own, other than one small ability that lets an agent look up whether its pending request was approved.
  • It does not replace an ability’s own permission checks. Those still run. This is a layer on top, not a substitute.
  • It does not govern MCP tools that were never registered as abilities. Some plugins serve tools directly without registering them; those are outside its reach, and the Coverage screen names them rather than leaving you to assume you are covered.
  • It does not phone home, collect telemetry, or make any external network request.

Requirements

  • WordPress 6.9 or later — the Abilities API arrived in core in 6.9
  • PHP 7.4 or later
  • At least one plugin that registers abilities, and usually an MCP server plugin to expose them

Source code

Development happens in the open at github.com/KevinPlugins/mcp-abilities-guard.

The admin screen is a Vue application. What runs in assets/ is the compiled bundle; the readable source it was built from ships alongside it, in the app/ directory of the plugin, together with the build configuration (app/package.json, app/vite.config.js). Run npm install && npm run build inside app/ to rebuild the bundle and compare it against what ships.

Privacy

Nothing leaves your site. There is no external service, no telemetry and no account. Requests, approvals and behaviour profiles are stored in your own database.

Arguments passed to abilities are stored with each queued request so a reviewer can see what was proposed. Values that look sensitive are redacted before display. Requests can be purged on a schedule you set, because those arguments may contain personal data.

About MCP

Model Context Protocol is an open specification originally developed by Anthropic. This plugin is a third-party project and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by Anthropic, nor by any of the MCP server plugins it works alongside.

  1. Install Kevin MCP Abilities Guard from the plugin directory, or upload the plugin zip.
  2. Activate it.
  3. Go to Tools > Kevin MCP Abilities Guard.

On a site that already has abilities registered, leave Learning mode on to begin with. The plugin watches and classifies without holding anything, so you can see what your abilities actually do before deciding anything. When the list looks right, turn learning mode off and set rules on the abilities you care about.

A reasonable starting point is to leave the defaults in place — reads and ordinary writes run, removals and outbound effects wait — and then add an always reject rule on anything you never want an agent touching, or a require approval rule on the few writes you want to keep an eye on.

  1. The abilities list. Every registered ability, from any MCP plugin, labelled by what it actually does — read, write or remove — with a per-ability rule: always allow, require approval (naming who signs off), or block.

    The abilities list. Every registered ability, from any MCP plugin, labelled by what it actually does — read, write or remove — with a per-ability rule: always allow, require approval (naming who signs off), or block.

  2. The approval queue, seen by someone who is not an approver for this request. A removal is held with its proposed arguments shown; the Approve button is disabled and explains why.

    The approval queue, seen by someone who is not an approver for this request. A removal is held with its proposed arguments shown; the Approve button is disabled and explains why.

  3. The same held request, seen by an approver — one click applies it or rejects it. Nothing has touched the site while it waits.

    The same held request, seen by an approver — one click applies it or rejects it. Nothing has touched the site while it waits.

  4. The audit log: every governed call — allowed, queued, blocked or reverted — with the caller, the outcome, and exactly what changed. (Change history and one-click undo are part of the Pro add-on.)

    The audit log: every governed call — allowed, queued, blocked or reverted — with the caller, the outcome, and exactly what changed. (Change history and one-click undo are part of the Pro add-on.)

  5. Undo in action: an applied change reverted from the log, the original row marked "reverted", and the undo itself recorded. (Pro add-on.)

    Undo in action: an applied change reverted from the log, the original row marked "reverted", and the undo itself recorded. (Pro add-on.)

  6. Settings. Reads and ordinary writes run automatically; only removals and outbound effects are held. Plus learning mode, holding unidentifiable callers, and request expiry.

    Settings. Reads and ordinary writes run automatically; only removals and outbound effects are held. Plus learning mode, holding unidentifiable callers, and request expiry.

Does it work with my MCP plugin?

It should. The guard attaches to abilities as WordPress registers them, so it does not care which plugin later exposes them. Tool calls are recognised by the MCP protocol’s own message shape rather than by any particular plugin’s endpoint, so no per-plugin support is needed.

Do I need to write any code?

No. Everything is set from the admin screen.

What is the difference between “require approval” and “always reject”?

Require approval holds the call and waits for a person. Always reject refuses it outright, tells the agent not to retry and not to attempt the same change another way, and records the attempt. Use reject for things no agent should ever do, so you are not answering the same prompt repeatedly.

What happens to the AI agent while a request is held?

It is told the request is queued, that nothing has changed, and that it should not retry. It can look up the outcome later through an ability the plugin registers for exactly that purpose. Agents told only “denied” tend to look for another route, which is why the wording matters.

Will it slow my site down?

It does nothing on front-end page loads. The work happens only while an ability is executing, which is an admin or API request.

What if an ability has never run?

Its code is inspected before it runs, which is usually enough to tell a read from a write from a removal. If that is inconclusive it is treated as an ordinary write and runs, while removals and outbound effects are held regardless. Nothing is ever labelled read-only on a guess.

Can it undo what an agent did?

Not on its own. This plugin’s job is to stop the change before it happens, and to keep an honest record that it did. Reverting one afterwards means storing every affected object’s previous state, which is a real cost and belongs with the feature that needs it — Kevin MCP Abilities Guard Pro.

Email, outbound requests and file writes cannot be undone by anything, at any price, which is why abilities that do those are never auto-allowed here.

Can different agents have different rules?

Yes. A caller proven by authentication can be given its own rules. A caller that merely says who it is can be told apart in the request queue and can have rules made stricter, but never looser — otherwise any client could claim to be your trusted one.

Can I require more than one person to approve?

In the free plugin a held request is applied by the first administrator who approves it. Requiring several approvers — naming specific users or roles, and choosing whether any one of them or all of them must sign off — is part of the Pro add-on.

An MCP tool is not in my list. Why?

It was probably never registered as an ability. Check the Coverage screen: tool calls that did not map to a registered ability are listed there. Its author would need to register those tools with the Abilities API for them to become governable.

Does it replace the permission checks abilities already have?

No. Those still run. This is an extra layer, not a substitute — an ability that refuses a user without the right capability still refuses them.

Does it send data anywhere?

No. No external service, no telemetry, no account.

1.0.0

  • Initial release.
  • Per-ability rules: always allow, require approval, always reject.
  • Covers abilities registered by any plugin, with no cooperation needed from their authors.
  • Recognises MCP tool calls by protocol shape, so a rule holds whichever server exposes the ability.
  • Read/write classification by observation and by inspecting the ability’s code, with the basis shown for each.
  • Mail, outbound requests and file writes are never auto-allowed.
  • Approval queue with per-caller rules, single-approval sign-off, and optional expiry (multiple approvers with any/all quorum in Pro).
  • Request history: what was asked, who answered it, and when.
  • Learning mode for classifying without holding anything.
  • Coverage reporting for MCP tool calls that map to no registered ability.
Back to top